Has anybody ever heard of people that lead normal and even intellectual lives, yet when put through a CAT, have no detectable brain? It's mentioned in this article:
www.alternativescience.com/no_b...r.htm
I thought it was fascinating, figured you guys might dig it, too
www.alternativescience.com/no_b...r.htm
I thought it was fascinating, figured you guys might dig it, too
-
Re: People With No Detectable Brain
Thu, December 1, 2005 - 4:18 PMYeah with no references, and looking at the site root page, it looks like an article from the Weekly World News. I've seen anencephalic babies before and can understand the whole survival with no more than reflex arc and rudimentary brain function, but math honors? I'd have to see the peer reviewed research articles. -
-
Re: People With No Detectable Brain
Fri, December 2, 2005 - 8:18 AMYes, you are Definitely right that more research into the subject is needed. I apologize for the lack of info in my post.
I did do some searching online, though, before posting the thread. The article was based off of the work of Dr. John Lorber, who performed most of his research around 1978. His main work was with adult patients that suffered from Hydrocephalus - an accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid in the head, which can displace the brain, and prevent brain growth after birth. Most infants die within weeks of being born with the condition, but some apparently grow up to live healthy lives, even though they have only minimal brain mass.
I haven't been able to find anything online that has the specific mark of peer review for his work...but I'm not really sure where to look either. There also doesn't seem to be anything I've found so far that specifically discredits the research, though.
I do know that his work was published in the magazine Science, in 1980. Most professional references to this work on the internet seem to state his research matter-of-factly, but maybe some team will take it up to confirm the work with additional studies at some point? -
-
Unsu...
Re: People With No Detectable Brain
Sun, December 4, 2005 - 11:01 AMI cannot find a reference to any papers written in Science by Lorber, but I did find this reference:"Is your brain really necessary?" www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi
This was published in the Nursing Mirror, a now defunct peer-reviewed journal. Science is absolutely a peer-riewed journal; perhaps the most respected journal out there.
The article in Science to which you are referring is a news piece written by Roger Lewin in 1980 (before Lorber's 1981 paper) titled "Is your brain really necessary?": www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi
This includes a case study by Dr. Lorber supposedly presented in Science Digest in 1983--though I can't find a reference for it--of a man who had decreased cortical thickness (~1 mm instead of ~5 for normal humans) who was functionally normal.
-
-
